logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.01.31 2018고단2315
강제추행
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person working as a dance player in entertainment planning company in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 2tel 3 floors, and the victim C (n, 20 years of age) is a practice student belonging to the above planning company.

At around 12:00 on January 27, 2018, the Defendant: (a) placed the victim on the floor and placed the victim on the floor in the above planning room, who completed the dance lessons with the said victim; and (b) placed the victim on the floor; and (c) opened the sound of the victim on his/her hand.

Accordingly, the defendant forcedly committed an indecent act against the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Investigation report (Evidence materials submitted by Victim C);

1. The CD [the defendant and his defense counsel claimed that the defendant met the victim's bridge and did not commit an indecent act because he did not commit the victim's act. The defendant and his defense counsel met the victim's sound appearance as stated in the judgment. The defendant and his defense counsel met the victim's legs, and this court duly adopted and investigated the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence, namely, credibility in the victim's statement in light of the victim C's specific and consistent statement about the harm caused by indecent act and the victim's legal statement attitude. The victim tried to scam with the defendant after the crime of this case, while the defendant tried to scam with the defendant, he found the representative director of the planning company immediately after the crime of this case, and notified the male-child group of the damage, and the defendant also divided the victim's conversations with the victim's male-gu and telephone conversation with the victim to scambling the victim's wrong. In particular, the defendant's indecent act and defense counsel's assertion in light of the fact that the defendant's indecent act were not applied to the victim's defendant and defense counsel.

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

arrow