Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Part of the facts charged was revised to the extent that it does not harm the defendant's right of defense.
[Criminal Records] On October 13, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspended execution due to the unlawful use of official marks at the Ulsan District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 21st of the same month.
[2] The Defendant is a person who has held Bone Star car in the 2017 High Court Decision 672.
1. On March 28, 2015, the Defendant was driving the said vehicle without a driver’s license in a section of about 3 km from the vicinity of the academic intercourse located in the Dong-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu to the front of the two schools located in the same Dong-dong to the front road of the two schools located in the same Dong-dong.
2. The Defendant in violation of the Automobile Management Act purchased the said car on March 2014 and operated the said car without being registered in the vehicle registration ledger from March 28, 2015 until March 28, 2015.
3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act operated the said car without mandatory insurance at the time, place, etc. set forth in paragraph 1.
The defendant of 2017 is a person who is engaged in the operation of Cpoter vehicles.
1. On June 16, 2015, the Defendant driven a vehicle without a driver’s license in the section of about five kilometers from the front side of the North Korean territory, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu to the front side of the apartment road in the Dong-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., Ulsan-gu, to the front side of the apartment road.
2. On June 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) parked the above Poter vehicle in front of the apartment zone on the world-wide apartment zone located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, 341-1, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, Seoul-do on June 16, 2015; and (b) started again.
In such a case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle had a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating the steering direction and brake system prior to the departure of the motor vehicle and by safely operating the steering direction and brake system.
Nevertheless, the defendant is guilty.