logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 (제주) 2018.02.14 2017나10710
소유권말소등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is modified or part of it is added as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. From the fourth part of the first instance court's decision, the fifth part of the first instance court's decision "the date of October 28, 2016," and the second part's "the date of January 6, 2005," respectively, shall be read as "the date of January 26, 2005," and the third part of the second part's "the date of January 26, 2005," shall be read as "the special agreement for the cancellation of a contract" and the third part of the fifth part of the first instance court's decision shall be read as "the date of the first instance court's decision," and the following shall be added to "the date of the second part's decision," and if the approval for the execution of a development project of this case is cancelled after five years have passed since the conclusion of the contract, as sought by the Plaintiff in this case, it shall have been considered that each of the real estate of this case was concluded at the time of the conclusion of the contract of this case.

Nevertheless, without closely examining the requirements for repurchase or the period of repurchase as above, the Plaintiff agreed to the period of repurchase 5 years from the date of the conclusion of each purchase and sale contract, which was five years after the date of the conclusion of each purchase and sale contract, and the approval of the execution of each of the instant real estate was revoked at the time when five years have passed since the conclusion of each

(ii) the Act;

3. As such, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance shall be just, and the plaintiff's appeal shall be dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow