logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.10.11 2018고단521
사기
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. A factory laboratory [the background of the case] The defendant is the birth-friendly relationship C of the victim B, and the defendant was operated for C as D and E.

to make an investment in money at the meeting; and

C invested 60,000 won around July 2014, and 50,000 won on February 27, 2015.

Since then, the Defendant: “I need to return 100 million won invested money of D, a partner; and C refused to pay more investment money than C.

Accordingly, the Defendant decided to invest this KRW 100 million in E, paid out KRW 8,50,00 to Na who operates F, and also can receive a loan from 80,000 to 100,000 won with a loan from NA to 80,000,000 won, and C decided that she either she either she or she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she

[2] Around March 2015, the Defendant loaned 100 million won to the victim B by telephone, and the Defendant decided to make an investment of 100 million won, and the Defendant would make an offer as security the H ex post facto cook, which he/she operates.

In addition, it is required to receive KRW 85 million from G of Korea F, and it is possible to receive a loan from KRW 80,00 to KRW 100,000 for a business operator's loan, which can be paid at 24% per annum until April 30, 2015. "In this words, it was transferred to the Agricultural Cooperative account (I) in the name of D around March 31, 2015 from the person who believed it.

However, there is no way to make an investment in E or offer H after childbirth as a collateral, and since G loaned 85 million won to G from his/her own penalty to the Defendant, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the above amount to the victim up to April 30, 2015, even if G paid the amount, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the amount to the victim up to April 30, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and obtained a delivery of KRW 100 million.

2. Determination:

A. Defendant and ..

arrow