logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.10.12 2015나2048083
보험에관한 소송
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the pertinent parts of the judgment of the court of first instance are modified as stated in the following paragraph (2). Thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(See the attached Form of the first instance court's decision) Nos. 6 and 7 of the 7th court's first instance court's decision in the second instance court's decision, " alone with the facts recognized and the evidence submitted by the plaintiff" shall be construed as "the above-mentioned facts, the evidence submitted by the plaintiff, and the result of entrustment of each medical record appraisal with respect to the Hanyang University Hospital and the Central University Hospital" submitted by the plaintiff.

The evidence submitted by the plaintiff in Part 4 of the 8th judgment of the first instance court was " alone, with the evidence submitted by the plaintiff, the Hanyang University Hospital submitted by the plaintiff, and the result of each request for the appraisal of medical records to the Central University Hospital."

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow