logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.09.04 2014구합1026
정보공개거부처분취소
Text

1. As of January 7, 2014, the Defendant’s decision to disclose information to the Plaintiff, excluding the name of the person who made the statement.

Reasons

1. The following facts, such as the background of the disposition, do not conflict between the parties, or if the whole purport of the pleading was added to the entry of evidence No. 1, it may be acknowledged:

On January 6, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a claim for disclosure of information with the Defendant to disclose the list of the case (hereinafter “instant list”) records in the Daejeon District Prosecutors’ Office No. 2013 type No. 2009 and No. 2012 type No. 4699, Jan. 6, 2014.

B. On January 7, 2014, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the decision to the effect that the list of records in the instant case constitutes non-disclosure information provided by the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”) on the grounds that the disclosure of records in the instant case constitutes the non-disclosure information under the said Act (hereinafter “instant refusal disposition”).

① The recording list of this case constitutes “information pertaining to a trial in progress, and information pertaining to the prevention and investigation of crimes, institution and maintenance of public prosecution, execution and correction of punishment, and security disposition, which, if disclosed, have considerable grounds to believe that it is significantly difficult to perform their duties.”

(2) The name, the person who has made a statement, and the date of preparation of the documents listed in the records of this case shall be “personal information, such as the name, resident registration number, etc. included in the relevant information, which, if disclosed, is deemed likely to infringe on the privacy or freedom of privacy.”

(c) Entry in the attached statutes of the relevant statutes are as follows.

2. Whether the rejection disposition of this case is legitimate

A. (i) The Plaintiff’s right to information disclosure under the Constitution may request disclosure of the right to receive and collect information (the freedom of information and the prohibition of interference with the receipt of information) and information without interference.

arrow