1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Evidence 【Evidence】 1-1, 2, 2-1, 2, 3, 6-1 through 6, 7-1 through 5, 8-1 through 3, 9-1 through 3, 10 through 12, 13-1 through 3, 3, 8, and 5 of the whole pleadings;

A. The Plaintiff is a stock company that provides consulting services such as receiving orders from overseas plants, etc., and the Defendant is a stock company that carries on plant business such as active carbon manufacturing and equipment.

B. On August 16, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a consulting agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant with respect to the agreement for the construction of active coal production facilities between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, with the content that the Plaintiff would enter into a contract for the construction of the instant plant, the conclusion of the contract for the construction of the plant, the conclusion of the contract for the construction of the plant, and the performance of the contract for the construction of the Defendant’s overseas trading office for the Defendant’s

(2) On August 31, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a consulting agreement with the Defendant on three (C, D, and E) active coal production contracts with Thailand, with the effect that the Plaintiff would enter into a contract for the plant construction contract with the Defendant on the acceptance of orders and orders for the above plant construction contract, and carry out the foreign trade offices for the Defendant’s products, and the relevant disputes on behalf of the Plaintiff.

(3) The Defendant is giving orders for construction works of Thailand C according to the Plaintiff’s consulting.

(4) On August 26, 2015, C Company appointed the Plaintiff’s representative director F as the field supervisor of the instant construction project with respect to active carbon production and equipment construction works (hereinafter “instant construction”).

On the other hand, according to the agreement between the defendant and the non-party to the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., G, an employee of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd, was dispatched to the construction site of this case, and was in charge of the public service (such as various written requests, etc. in the construction site, an urgent reason for modification of design, material approval, construction drawings, work log, load list, and monthly schedule, etc.).

C. On December 26, 2015, G returned to Korea on December 26, 2015 due to the termination of the contract between the Defendant and the L&W Accounting Co., Ltd., and F was unable to perform its duties due to the absence of official duties.