1. On October 30, 2014 and February 4, 2015, the Defendant’s disposition imposing customs duties, etc. on the Plaintiff shall be revoked.

2.

A. On April 24, 2009, the Plaintiff entered into a license agreement (hereinafter referred to as “the license agreement of this case”) with C on April 12, 2007, as follows, on April 12, 2007, when the Plaintiff entered into a license agreement (hereinafter referred to as “the license agreement of this case”) with C on March 14, 2008, when the Plaintiff entered into a license agreement of this case on April 14, 2007, when the Plaintiff entered into a license agreement of this case on March 14, 2008, when the Plaintiff entered into a license agreement of this case on March 25, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as “the license agreement of this case”).

Of them, the fourth license agreement was concluded. Of them, a foreign-capital invested company established by C by investing on March 8, 2005 (100 per cent of its equity ratio), which is a foreign-capital invested company (100 per cent of its equity ratio), and Nonparty Q Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “ Q”) that carries out the tobacco manufacturing process.

) The contracting party is also the third license agreement under the second license agreement under the second license agreement under the third license agreement under the third license agreement under the third license agreement under the fourth license agreement under the fourth license agreement on May 1, 2005, and on December 18, 2007, 2008.

(However, with respect to the granting of a license to carry out, the first to the Plaintiff, Q and C, as well as the project operation know-how of liquid display glass plates, the following agreements are made:

5. The term "satisfry manufacturing technology" means, (1) the main patent and the soften-sat-sat-sat-satum.

6. The term "mathy technology" means, inter alia, the main patent and the flady mathy;

7. The term "patent" means a Japanese patent (which is pending in the Korean Intellectual Property Office in a single country) as shown in the attached Table 1, a patent application filed in the whole world which is an substantially identical invention, and a patent application filed in relation thereto;

8. The term "patent for this case" means Japan, Japan, as shown in the Appendix 3.