beta
Text
1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year;
2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On January 10, 2003, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 700,000 to a fine of KRW 1 million for the same crime at Suwon District Court on June 30, 2004, to a summary order of KRW 1 million for the same crime at Suwon District Court on October 11, 2006, to a summary order of KRW 4 million for the same crime from Suwon District Court on April 26, 2007, and to a summary order of KRW 9 million for the same crime at the same court on December 18, 2008.
【Criminal Facts】
On November 10, 2014, at around 23:00, the Defendant driven B 3.5 tons of car trucks at the 2km section from the roads in front of the Chang-gu, Chang-gu, Chang-gu, Chang-gu to the roads in front of the high-duk-gu, Gyeong-gu, Goak-gu.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Report on the circumstances of driving under the influence of alcohol and report on the control of drinking driving;
1. Previous records: The application of criminal records, inquiry and other Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and the order to attend a lecture is a very dangerous and serious crime that may lead to the life of any person subject to probation and the order to attend a lecture. However, in light of the fact that the defendant is committing such a crime too easily and repeatedly, it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant in light of the fact that the defendant is committing such crime.
I would like to say.
However, considering the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime, and the crime of this case was committed in six years from the last crime, and the defendant again sold his own vehicle with intent not to commit the same crime, the age of the defendant, and the sale of the vehicle at this time.