A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 12:30 on June 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) reported that the victim D followed the victim’s c apartment complex “A” by scaming the scam of the scam; and (b) stated that “the victim shall not scam the scam,” and that “the victim scam the scam of the scam of the scam, scam of the scam of the scam; (c) scam scam of the victim; (d) scam scam of the victim; (d) scam the scam of the victim’s scam; and (e) scam of the victim’s scam with the scam of the victim’s scam; and (e) scaming the victim’s scam and scam of the victim’s face by assaulting the victim’s s body.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Although Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution is not sufficient to repent the defendant, there are circumstances to consider the situation as the victim D's act was caused by the occurrence of the instant case, the defendant is old, is not good, there are many same kinds of records.