logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.07.08 2016고단1605
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 1, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for habitual larceny at the Changwon District Court on September 1, 2015 and completed the execution of the sentence at the Changwon Prison on February 13, 2016.

1. On March 30, 2016, around 15:00 on March 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was divided into the front house of the Victim D and confirmed that there was no person inside the house; (b) opened a studio door in excess of the fence and intruded the victim’s residence; and (c) brought about approximately KRW 5,000 in cash, which was contained in the same tradition adjacent to the telephone inside the room; and (d) committed intrusion upon the residence and theft of the Defendant on March 30, 2016, around 15:00, in front of the Victim F’s house in Kimhae-si, and confirmed that there was no person in the house; and (b) entered the house with the head of the victim’s house and the head of the house in excess of the fence and did not correct the fence; and (b) went into the house, and (c) went into the house in front of the victim’s house.

On May 9, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft of KRW 10,00 cultural gift certificates 2; (b) on May 9, 2016, the Defendant: (c) on the part of 09:41, Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si, and confirmed that he did not have any person in the house; (d) used the pipe cutting tool in the victim’s house warehouse, used the pipe cutting tool in the victim’s house warehouse, carried the kitchen windows in the victim’s house and intrudes the victim’s house into the house; and (e) 18 K K 1,90,000 won in the market price in the victim’s house being kept in the inner house, which caused the theft of precious metal amounting to the sum of KRW 1,98,00,000,000 in the market price of 10,000 won in the victim’s house. The summary of evidence was stolen.

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of a suspect of the police officer regarding I;

1. Each statement;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, (A) and Acts and subordinate statutes to report an investigation (verification of suspect repeated period);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and the larceny of option of punishment: Violation of residence under Article 329 of the Criminal Act; the Criminal Act;

arrow