logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.04.03 2014고단3079
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등협박)등
Text

Article 1-B (2) of the judgment of the court below as to the crime No. 1-B (1) of the judgment of the court below and the crime No. 1-B (2) of the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On November 28, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment with labor and 5 million won by the Suwon District Court for the crime of interference with business, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 6, 2013, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Suwon Detention House on February 16, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

1. "2014 Highest 3079";

A. From September 2012 to October 2012, the Defendant, at around 20:30, expressed the same attitude that the Defendant would inflict a bodily injury on the victim’s body by putting him/her in his/her hand a dangerous object, which he/she was in possession of on the ground that he/she had expressed an attitude of disregarding the Defendant, in the Eca of the victim D (Influence, 50 years of age) operated by Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Seoul.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

B. (1) On July 2013, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim F, on the ground that at the H restaurant for the operation of the victim F in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, from around 14:00 to 14:10 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) was spiting the victim of the crime on the ground that he was aware of the Defendant at the H restaurant for the operation of the victim F in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si; and (b) was spiting the victim with a large interest, such as “the victim’s fright of bitch, fright of bitch of bitch, bitch of bitch of bitch, bitch of bitch of bitch.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's above restaurant business by force for about 10 minutes.

(2) On August 2014, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim D was unable to avoid disturbance with the victim’s desire to talk about the following reasons: (a) on the ground that the victim had expressed an attitude of disregarding the Defendant in the Eda of the victim’s D management in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, for approximately 20 minutes of p.m. on the first day of August 2014; (b) on the ground that the victim expressed an attitude of disregarding the Defendant.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's business by force for approximately twenty minutes.

(3) Crimes against the victim I.

arrow