Text
1. The revocation of the decision that the Defendant rendered to the Plaintiff on April 3, 2012 is revoked.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.
Reasons
1. Disposition and circumstances (with no dispute, or B, or prior purport of pleading);
A. The Plaintiff entered the Army on April 9, 1983.
On June 21, 1983, he was diagnosed by the hydro-gropian nuclear escape certificate (No. 4-5, hereinafter "the instant wound"), and was hospitalized on July 12, 1983, and was discharged from the hospital on September 28, 1983 after being hospitalized on Sep. 1, 1983.
B. On April 27, 2007, the Plaintiff found that the application for registration of a person who rendered distinguished service to the State was defective, and the Defendant rendered a decision that constituted the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished service to the State by recognizing that the instant wounds were caused or aggravated due to military service around November 10, 207.
The plaintiff was under physical examination for the classification of disability ratings, but did not register a person of distinguished service to the State on January 8, 2008.
C. The Plaintiff filed an application for a physical examination for re-verification on September 2012, when two years have passed since the Plaintiff received a new physical examination.
On March 22, 2012, the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement decided on March 2, 2012 to recognize that there was a proximate causal relation with the military performance of official duties, taking into account the following: (a) the record: (b) “In the event of a military entrance and a movement while making a call while taking the military; (c) the person was fluored with a drug; and (d) it is difficult to deem that there was an external trauma other than the record that “in the event of a physical strength in a training club, the person was fluored with a drug while making a call at the military; and (d) the fact that there
On April 3, 2012, the Defendant rendered a non-existence of the requirements for persons of distinguished service to the State (the instant disposition) to revoke the previous decision to the Plaintiff on April 3, 2012.
2. Determination
A. Administrative agencies may ex officio revoke the previous dispositions they have made, but the previous dispositions should first be unlawful in order to revoke the previous dispositions.
In addition, even if the previous disposition is illegal, the parties shall consider the benefits created in trust of the existing disposition, and the benefits and balancing to be achieved by the cancellation.