1. The Defendant’s KRW 20,000,000 as well as its annual rate from June 2, 2016 to October 19, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 10, 2009, the Plaintiff is a legal spouse who has completed a marriage report with Nonparty C (hereinafter “Nonindicted Party”) on November 10, 2009 and has three children under the chain.

In the course of operating the Taekwondo Driving Institute, the non-party, as the original parent, entered into a close relationship with the defendant who is a friend female at his/her parents from around 2014.

B. On January 8, 2015, the Plaintiff became aware of the relationship between the Nonparty and the Defendant through the Defendant’s telephone call and its handphone, and the telephone record, which were treated as a Handphone of the Nonparty returned to Korea at a 3-clock point of January 8, 2015.

(B) Prior to this, the Defendant had become aware of his relations through a different channel. The names of the original Defendant (D, E, F, G, etc.) took place in various places, such as Defendant and the Nonparty, including Defendant’s beauty room, a restaurant, and a vehicle that led to the birth of the Defendant and the Nonparty, or attempted to install the lighting of meals or the above beauty room, throughout the course of 2014 and rhying.

C. In early 2015, at the time of the Plaintiff’s birth to a postnatal care center, the Defendant and the Nonparty sent daily life to the KIKO located in the long distance by joining their respective children.

On August 16, 2015, during the business trip period in Gangwon-do, the Nonparty purchased clothes for women, Defendant’s children, etc. by entering the department stores located in Suwon-do. At this time, the Defendant received the accumulation of customer points from each of the above purchase prices.

The Plaintiff installed a tape recorder on the Non-Party’s vehicle to secure additional evidence.

According to the recording file, it is confirmed that the Nonparty, who was the other party to the telephone on November 2015, uses the name, etc. of “self” to the Defendant, who was the other party to the telephone on November 2015, is divided into conversations that suggest the sexual relationship with the other party without a forum.

E. When the relationship with the Defendant was discovered to the Plaintiff, the Nonparty: (a) promised that the relationship with the Defendant would no longer be exchanged with the Defendant, respectively.

F. The Defendant is a policeman in January 2016.