beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following “the second order”, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420
2. The third-party 7 to 17 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be dismissed as follows.
[Supplementary note] The Defendants 1 and 15:26, the Defendant 2 and 15:18, on April 23, 2017, were unable to use the Plaintiff’s bus on April 23, 2017. The Defendants 21 and 3 and 5 (including those with serial numbers) were as seen earlier. According to the following: (a) the Defendant 1 and 14:34 and 15:26, after the Defendant 2 and 15:18, the Defendant 2 and 15:18, on April 23, 2017.
It is recognized that sending a letter to the effect that it was sent from a bus to a place where it was loaded.
However, under the following circumstances, the time when the Plaintiff sent letters to Defendant B was at least two hours from 13:0 to 13:00 to 2: (a) the time when the Plaintiff agreed to communicate several times, and the Defendants’ daily activities were failed, and thus, it seems difficult for the Plaintiff to expect the Plaintiff to make a text message. In light of the fact that the Defendants’ daily activities had already been paid the entire travel expenses, the Plaintiff appears to have not returned to the Republic of Korea through Gwangju, taking into account the possession of the items, such as walls or keys, on the ground that the Plaintiff did not receive two calls once in the event that the Plaintiff had already paid the entire travel expenses, and that the Plaintiff could not return to the Republic of Korea through the long, advanced, and Gwangju. In light of the foregoing, the Plaintiff is mainly responsible for the Plaintiff’s failure to meet the Defendants’ daily activities prior to the passenger terminal, which is the place of promise, and the Defendants’ daily activities using other means of transportation.