beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Criminal facts
【The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of eight-month imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Ulsan District Court on November 15, 2013; two-year imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act; 40 hours; and on June 19, 2014, the same court was sentenced to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (toxicly Driving); a violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licensed Driving); and a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (non-licensed Driving); and on September 13, 2014, the sentence of the suspended sentence was invalidated upon the final judgment; and on July 3, 2015, the execution of the said sentence was terminated at the Ulsan District Court at the Ulsan District Court on July 3, 2015.
【Criminal Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.】
On May 20, 2018, the Defendant straighted the two-lanes from the two kings away from the kings away from May 20, 2018, the two-lanes away from the kings away of trees.
At the same time, other vehicles were stopped in accordance with the stop signals, so there was a duty of care to care for those engaged in driving of a motor vehicle to see the front door well, maintain the safety distance with the preceding motor vehicle, and accurately operate the brake system to avoid drilling.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to maintain the safety distance and neglected the operation of the operation of the operation system, and caused the victim C(49 tax) who stopped at the front section of the Defendant’s vehicle driving Di30, which was stopped at the Defendant’s front section, to the part on the front section of the Defendant’s vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to salt and tensions by occupational negligence on the part of the victim, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, the Defendant, while destroying the said i30 car to cover KRW 268,948, the repair cost, did not take necessary measures to immediately stop.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police against C;
1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a survey report on the actual condition;