logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.04.11 2013노2063
모욕
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding) is as follows: (a) the Defendant stated in the facts charged that “the victim’s daily demand” was “the victim’s in relation to the victim’s daily demand; and (b) the victim’s loss of money at the restaurant is not written as indicated in the judgment of the court below.

2. There is evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, E and G’s statements are made by the witness E and G of the court below. The victim, who is the victim, consistently from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, suspected of the victim as to the loss of money in the restaurant, and stated the victim’s “Any other person who has no particular interest with the defendant and the victim” in the same purport.

According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below including the statement of witness E in the court below, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow