logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.03.08 2017고단1297
특수상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be returned to the victim C.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 11, 2017, the Defendant, at around 18:30 of Pyeongtaek-si, had been under the influence of alcohol in front of Pyeongtaek-si 51, a dangerous object, which had been located there, and had been an injury to the Victim D(36 tax) during approximately two weeks of medical treatment, on the part of the Victim D(36 tax).

On April 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 12:15 on April 2, 2017, the Defendant 2017, at the square in front of Pyeongtaek-si 51 square, and (b) 4 drinking in front of the 51 square, such as the victim E (57 taxes). The Defendant fluorddd the Defendant’s drinking in the heart of the victim; (c) the Defendant fluordd the victim with the victim, and fluord the victim’s head, which is a dangerous object, caused the victim’s injury, such as fluoring the victim’s head at one time to tear the number of days of treatment; and (d) fluoring the victim’s hair.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

"2017 Highest 1854"

1. On August 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on a public telephone box installed at around 51:00 Pyeongtaek-si, Pyeongtaek-si; (b) on the part of the victim C, she obtained a copy of the Victim C’s Postal Card (F) from the victim and did not take necessary procedures, such as returning it to the victim; and (c) on the part of the Defendant, she thought her own.

As a result, the Defendant embezzled the property that escaped from the possession of the victim C.

2. On August 1, 2017, at around 23:40, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim in the “I” restaurant for the operation of the Victim H in Pyeongtaek-si G; (b) instead of having no intent or ability to pay the food, the Defendant acquired financial benefits equivalent to the same amount as the Defendant did not pay the price by deceiving the victim into being provided with 40,000 won in total.

Accordingly, the defendant had acquired property benefits by deceiving the victim H.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 1297"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A victim;

arrow