logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2018.07.05 2018가단31237
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The defendant shall indicate the annexed drawings (1), (2), (3), (4), and (1) of the real estate listed in the annexed list in sequence.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. A. A network B (hereinafter “the network”) around December 1993 entered into a state forest loan agreement with the head of the Gu-U.S. State forest management office (the Plaintiff delegated the duties concerning the management and disposal of the said forest, which is the State property, to the Plaintiff) and the head of the Gu-U.S. State forest management office (the Plaintiff delegated the duties concerning the management and disposal of the said forest, which is the State property), with regard to the leased area, which is 64,462 square meters of the 1,148,038 square meters of Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si (the part of 30,000 square meters of the said forest, among the above forest, was excluded from grassland around October 20, 203).

B. On the ground of the instant forest land, the Deceased newly constructed 1, 2, 3, 4, and 19 square meters manager of the section (a) on the part of the instant forest land connected with each of the said items (hereinafter “the instant manager”) and 199 square meters on the part of the manager of the instant forest land (hereinafter “the instant manager”) and 5 livestock pens in part (hereinafter “the instant livestock shed, etc.”) with the Defendant, while living in the instant forest with the Defendant and operating “D” on June 30, 2013.

C. E, the deceased’s spouse and the sole heir, must pay the Plaintiff for the expenses invested in incidental facilities, such as grassland and livestock shed, in accordance with the Grassland Act (main claim), and for the payment of the purchase price following the exercise of the right to purchase ground water and the damages for delay thereof (Preliminary claim), but all of them were dismissed (Seoul Central District Court 2014Gahap56400), respectively.

The Plaintiff filed a claim against E for the removal of the instant stable, etc. and the delivery of the instant forest land (Seoul Central District Court 2015 Gohap505866), and all of the aforementioned claims were accepted, and the said quoted judgment was finalized on May 3, 2016.

(hereinafter “the final judgment of this case”). (e)

The defendant requested the head of the Gu-U.S. National Forest Management Office to change the title of the instant forest to himself/herself and to extend the loan period. However, the head of the Gu-U.S. National Forest Management Office on December 2013.

arrow