A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. On March 23, 2015, the Defendant related to the mobile communications service stated that “Around March 23, 2015, the Defendant would make it possible for the Defendant to pay off the late payment of the late payment of the late payment of the late payment of the late payment of the late payment of the late payment of the late payment of the late payment of the late payment of the late payment of the late payment of the late payment of the late payment of the late payment of the late payment of the late payment of the late payment of the late payment of the late payment of the late payment of the late payment of the late payment of the cost of the new mobile phone, and the

However, in fact, even if the defendant received Samsung Tgallon's mobile phone return from the victim, he had the intent to use the money received by selling the mobile phone for the debt repayment, etc., and even if he purchased a new mobile phone service, he did not pay the overdue mobile phone installment cost to the victim, or did not have the intent or ability to discount the new purchase mobile phone installment cost and the new purchase mobile phone service fee.

In other words, the Defendant received one cellular phone device from the victim at the market price in Samsung galth, and around that time, from October 28, 2015 to October 28, 2015, the Defendant obtained a total of 20 victims of the mobile phone device from the market price in the above method, or obtained pecuniary benefits by inducing them to acquire it or to subscribe to new mobile communication service.

B. On March 19, 2015, the Defendant related to Internet supply services said that “The Victim F will provide for charges, penalty, etc. if he/she terminates the existing Internet and newly joins the existing Internet” with the victim F.

However, even if the victim subscribed to a new Internet supply contract, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the penalty on behalf of the victim, or reduce the service fees of the new Internet supply contract.

The defendant.