Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was disputing the ownership of the building D with the owner of the building in Yong-gu, Nam-gu, Dong-gu, Seoul:

1. On April 2012, 2012, the victim G operating the office of “F Licensed Real Estate Agent” located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, entrusted the sale and purchase or brokerage of the above “C Borrowing” from D, and the same

5. On May 23, 2012, the Defendant, posted on the outer wall of the above building (the “sale and lease” of the above building and the “the telephone number of the victim’s office”) to damage the promotional display cards, and then damaged the part on which the victim’s telephone number on the display card posted in front of the above building was displayed in a knife, etc., and the victim again posted the display card, around May 25, 2012, damaged the said display card by the same method as the victim’s market value and damaged the property in an amount of KRW 300,000,000 as the market value.

2. On June 2012, 2012, in order to remove the fluor card of the injured party G from the above rooftop of the building and to post a fluor card for publicity with the Defendant’s contact information, the victim went to and intrudes into the victim’s above licensed real estate agent office, and the victim was kept in custody on the fluor’s fluor, with two keys of the market value equivalent to KRW 100,000,000 in the market value, such as the rooftop of the building and the 102 fluoral key of the 102 fluor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and G;

1. Protocol of inspection by this Court;

1. Statement of each police statement concerning G and D;

1. Determination as to the defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion of the investigation report (the complainant G telephone statement)

1. The summary of the argument is that the Defendant continued to keep all the keyss of the instant building, including the rooftop of the building and the key to the 102 suspender door, because the Defendant was entrusted by D with the purchase and sale of C Borrowing and the brokerage of the charter contract, with respect to the facts charged of the instant building intrusion and theft. As such, the key as indicated in the facts charged is as follows.