Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a ma-car.

On March 25, 2016, the Defendant proceeded along the four-lane road in front of the D main points located in Gangseo-si, Gangnam-si, Seoul, along the intersection of the Red Cross through the intersection of terminal from the intersection of the Red Cross to the intersection of the terminal.

Since there is a road with a speed of 60 km per hour, there was a duty of care to maintain the speed limit to those engaged in driving of a motor vehicle and to drive the motor vehicle safely by checking well the right and the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded with a speed of about 84 km in speed exceeding 24 km per hour while neglecting it, and received the bicycle rear wheels part of the victim E (71 tax) driving that was going on before the Defendant at the time, and received the front part of the horse car.

Defendant 1 suffered injury to the victim, such as the pressure pressure of 12 weeks in need of approximately 12 weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A traffic accident analysis and appraisal report and a traffic accident analysis report;

1. Skid photographs of each field;

1. A report of investigation (a criminal investigation on the part applied to the motor vehicle of the defendant);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The grounds for sentencing are contrary to Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection, etc. of Social Service Order, the fact that there is no previous conviction of qualification suspension or more than punishment, the fact that the insured is covered by a comprehensive insurance (the special meaning of the deposit of a part of the damage compensation under the insurance coverage does not exist), the defendant's family environment, support relationship, etc. are considered as favorable circumstances, and the defendant