The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the consistent and specific statement of damage to the victimized child and the hole photographs of the victimized child’s sale part, the mother of the victimized child and the mother of the victimized child and their statements, etc., it is recognized that the Defendant committed physical abuse against the victimized child, such as the facts charged in this case, with respect to the victimized child.

Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. In light of the statements made by the victimized child as shown in the facts charged in the instant case, the mother and the mother of the victimized child, the joint signature of the damaged child, etc., there is doubt as to whether the Defendant did not engage in physical abuse against the victimized child, such as the instant facts charged.

B. However, in light of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the court below and the court below's duly adopted and examined evidence, it is insufficient to view that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone alone proves that the defendant committed physical abuse under the margin that the defendant was engaged in a knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife kn

Therefore, the prosecutor's assertion of mistake is not accepted.

1) After completing the training course, the Defendant appears to have served the reasons why the victimized child was not at the location of clothes, and the victimized child was at the location of the clothes. The Defendant appears to have served the victimized child with the care of the victimized child, and the victimized child was at the location of the dive child, and the Defendant was at the inside of the escape room by putting the victimized child’s hand or arms on the part of the victimized child (the investigative record 22,25 pages, and the Defendant was at the inside of the escape room without the Defendant’s proper remarks.