A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 17, 2016, 19:43 on December 17, 2016, the Defendant was urged to sign documents related to drinking and return home from the police officer D to the police officer, who was dissatisfied with the fact that the police officer was under the influence of drinking within the police box located in B located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, B, and asked him to return home.

The term “Woo-man,” and was assaulted by having the parts of the said D’s timbered, followed by a bad hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing site photographs interfering with the performance of official duties A by the suspect;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment.

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [the grounds for sentencing favorable to the reasons for sentencing] [the scope of recommendations] and the basic area (from June to January, 1) of Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Official Duties (the scope of recommendations] (the grounds for sentencing) [no person subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] [the defendant has a history of criminal punishment for violent crimes, and the defendant has a history of criminal punishment, and the crime related to interference with the performance of official duties is a crime detrimental to the State's function by nullifyinging legitimate exercise of public power, so it is necessary to strictly punish the establishment of national legal order and eradicating light

On the other hand, considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the confession of the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case in contingency under the influence of alcohol, the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case, and the degree of obstruction of assault and performance of official duties, etc., the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, means and consequence, etc., and various sentencing conditions as shown in the record, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., a sentence like the order of recommendation lower than the lowest sentence of the punishment set in the sentencing guidelines shall be determined.