1. The part concerning the conjunctive claim in the judgment of the first instance is modified as follows:

Defendant B, from the Plaintiff, 3.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendants’ status 1) Defendant K Co., Ltd. (the first trade name was a stock company BH, but was changed to K again after the change to L.)

hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Company”).

AW (i.e., the original representative director of the Plaintiff Company, along with the type AX), who was working as the representative director of the Plaintiff Company at the time the Plaintiff Company acquired the Defendant Company on or around August 26, 1989, and was working as the representative director of the Plaintiff Company at the time when the Plaintiff Company intending to become an son of the Plaintiff Company. However, even though the provisions on joint representation were repealed on February 27, 1982, it became each of the representative directors.

was a substantial master.

(2) On August 28, 1989, the Defendant Company was appointed as the representative director of the Defendant Company. Thereafter, AW resigned from the Defendant Company on September 11, 2002, was dismissed from office on November 1, 2002, and on May 26, 2003, the Plaintiff Company’s representative director and the director respectively resigned from office. (2) Defendant B entered the Plaintiff Company upon the recommendation of AW, who was working as the managing director of the Plaintiff Company as of March 3, 1978, and was appointed as the director of the Plaintiff Company on February 27, 1982.

After that, on August 28, 1989 upon the request of AW, directors and vice-presidents of the defendant company were assigned to the defendant company on or around January 1992, and only the plaintiff company was in charge of the representative director of the defendant company on or around September 15, 1992, AW was in charge of each of the directors of the defendant company on September 11, 2002, but it was the sole representative director upon resignation of the representative director of the defendant company on November 30, 2012, but retired respectively on or around March 31, 2014.

B. From May 22, 197 to May 29, 1997, the register of shareholders of the Defendant Company entered the Plaintiff Company’s 700,000 shares in the shares of the Defendant Company as a shareholder holding 1380,000 shares of the Defendant Company. 2) The Plaintiff Company was concurrently a director of the Defendant Company B and M (the director of the Plaintiff Company, the director of the planning office, and the production of AW), BI (the Plaintiff Company’s employees), BJ (the Plaintiff Company’s employees, and the BK Plaintiff Company.