logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.04.14 2015노4971
주거침입등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The gist of the prosecutor’s appeal (misunderstanding the facts as to the acquittal portion of the judgment below) acknowledged that the Defendant entered the Suwon-gu, Suwon-si C, 8th floor D 202, where the victim’s residence, and got off for a considerable period of time, such as reporting TV at the place, drinking, etc., the Defendant had a large number of records of theft of property by intrusion upon another’s residence. The Defendant had a large number of records of theft of property. The Defendant “The Defendant Slaughtered the said public notice 203, and had the rice provided to the recipients of basic life, so that he was delivered to the recipients of basic life.”

The defendant was well aware of the location of each room's preliminary key, stolen food in the telefrigerator in the public notice telefriger, and entered the room without permission when there is an empty room.

In light of the fact that the Defendant made a statement "," and the Defendant denied the fact that the Defendant entered the above notice 202, in the initial police investigation process, and reversed the Defendant's fingerprint reply letter, and thus, it is difficult to believe that the Defendant's statement denying the theft is also difficult, the Defendant may recognize the fact that he stolen the victim's property by entering the above notice tele 202.

Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby having acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged of the larceny of this case.

2. The judgment below held that the victim's 30,00 won of cash among damaged materials was not found in the victim's tin tin tin her fingerprint, there is no material showing that the defendant's fingerprints was found in the front cover of other damaged materials, and there is no material confirming that the gras found in the victim's room were the defendant, and there is no material confirming that the gras found in the victim's room are the defendant, and each gras found in the above notice room are kept in the office display box, and most of the users are aware of the existence and the place of storage of the gras.

arrow