logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2020.02.11 2019고단2385
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 24, 2018, the date when the recruitment of occupants was announced by the Defendant, the Defendant: (a) used the fact that C apartment buildings constructed in the Gu B B B B during Ansan-si are preferentially sold to residents after completing the resident registration at the time of Gyeyang-gu, the date when the recruitment of occupants is announced; (b) provided that D and the Defendant offered to sell the apartment by means of a disguised transfer of D at the time of Ansan-si and

D in violation of the Resident Registration Act, around May 10, 2018, was the F community service center in Ansan-gu E, and the fact was resided in the G Housing H in Bupyeong-si, Bupyeong-si, but it was the moving-in report of resident registration to the I and I of the underground level during Ansan-si.

Accordingly, the defendant reported false facts in collusion with D.

B. At the end of May 2018, D violated the Housing Act: (a) connected to the Internet site J using a computer at the end of the end of May 2018; and (b) was determined as the number of buyers of the above apartment house K in the manner of filing an application for sale after completing resident registration at the inside of the city; and (c) concluded a contract for sale with the implementer LA redevelopment and maintenance project partnership around June 19, 2018.

As a result, the Defendant conspired with D and received the housing constructed and supplied under the Housing Act by fraud or other improper means.

C. Business Interference D was awarded the winning in the above apartment K by applying for sale after the disguised transfer as described in the above A and B.

Accordingly, in collusion with D, the defendant interfered with the apartment sale business of the victim LA redevelopment project association, the implementer by fraudulent means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation report (attached to the protocol of interrogation of suspect under the nominal title of subscription and copy of contract for sale in lots), investigation report (Attachment to the protocol of interrogation of suspect by multiple buyers); and

1. Article 37 subparag. 3-2 of the Resident Registration Act regarding facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and Article 1606 of the former Housing Act (amended by Act No. 1606, Dec. 18, 2018).

arrow