1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid in addition below shall be revoked.

2.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages and limitation on liability;

A. Comprehensively taking account of the descriptions and images of Gap's evidence Nos. 2 through 5, 14, 15, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 5 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the whole purport of the pleadings, the defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract with Eul with respect to CScarc Trac Trac Trac Trac Trac c (hereinafter "Defendant vehicle"), on August 30, 2012, the defendant was driving the defendant vehicle around 20:20 on the 30:0,000 from the front side of the Jinc Hac Hack-ro, the right side of the plaintiff's vehicle and the left side side of the plaintiff's vehicle (hereinafter "the plaintiff's vehicle"), while the overtaking is prohibited from overtaking the vehicle due to the plaintiff's negligence in his duty of care to avoid overtaking the other vehicle, and the part of the plaintiff's overtaking 5 vehicle's vehicle's vehicle's vehicle's left side by the plaintiff's 5 vehicle.

2) In light of the above facts, the Defendant, the insurer B, is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred by the Plaintiff due to the instant accident. (B) The Defendant alleged that the Plaintiff was responsible for making a left-hand turn without turning on the direction, etc. at the time of the instant accident, and that the Plaintiff was negligent in failing to wear the safety level, and thus, the Plaintiff’s negligence should be considered. However, the above evidence alone did not turn on the direction, etc. at the time of the instant accident, and made a left-hand turn without

It is not enough to recognize the fact that the safety labelling is not worn, and it is otherwise recognized.