logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.12.17 2015가단4265
보험금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On July 29, 2002, B entered into a disaster relief insurance contract with the Defendant and the insured as the Plaintiff upon the death of C and C (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

According to the contents of the insurance contract of this case, the insurance money paid when the insured died due to a holiday accident is KRW 50 million.

B. C was found to have been used as a source farm road on September 8, 2013 in Ansan-si, Andong-si, and the first responder belonging to Andong Fire Captain was dispatched to the said site at around 20:22 on the same day after receiving the report on September 8, 2013 and arrived at the said site at around 20:35.

C. Around the time when an emergency medical service worker belonging to the Sdong Fire Fighting Team arrives at the above site, C has already been in the state of heart suspension and respiratory suspension, and an emergency medical service worker immediately conducted cardiopulmonary resuscitation and conducted cardiopulmonary resuscitation even during the transport to a hospital, but did not have any response.

C was transferred to D Hospital at around 21:18 on the same day, but D Hospital was judged as a direct death, and died at around 21:46 on the same day. D.

C According to the medical image taken at the time of death of C, it was found that the body to escape from the upper end of the left head, the upper part of the upper part of the body, the upper part of the upper part of the body, the upper part of the body, the upper part of the body, the upper part of the body, and the body of the body and the body of the body of the body.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Gap evidence 7 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. On September 8, 2013, the Plaintiff’s assertion that was a holiday, C was laid off with a fry and cage cages due to an unknown external accident, which led to the outbreak of a scarf and scarf, thereby resulting in a serious stop.

Therefore, even if it is not so, us can us us us us us us us us us us us us us us us us us us us us us us us us us s us us s us uss us us

As a result, C died due to an accident, which is an accident on holidays, the Defendant is the insurance contract of this case.

arrow