The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is deemed to have stolen another person’s property by means of intrusion upon another person’s structure, etc. on seven occasions, and the nature of the crime is not good.

In addition, the defendant not only has been punished three times for the same crime, but also has committed the crime of this case during the suspension of execution due to the same crime, and is also under the responsibility for such crime.

Some damage caused by the crime of this case was temporarily returned to the victims, but most damage has not yet been recovered.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, details and details of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and pleadings do not seem to be unfair because the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.