logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.09.05 2018고단261
사기
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months;

Defendant, as the claimant, shall be liable for damages

1. G.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] Defendant

1. A case: The judgment of fraud that was rendered on May 18, 2017 by the Changwon District Court: Imprisonment with prison labor for a period of one year and two months: On October 4, 2017, the case is "criminal facts" / [the case is "the 2018 High Court Order 261"

1. On October 17, 2017, Defendant A’s sole criminal defendant is a pop-up head of a golf bond with access to the Internet “China-highest country” NAV car page located in Kimhae-si on or around October 17, 2017.

The purpose of this article is to send golf bonds to the victim L who reported and contacted the advertisement to the effect that he/she will transfer the golf bond amount of KRW 200,000 to the victim L.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to issue golf bonds even if he has received money from the injured party.

The Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) received KRW 200,000 from the victim L to the Agricultural Cooperative account (M) in the name of the Defendant; and (c) received KRW 315,100,00 from the victim 3 in total from October 22, 2017 through the above method as indicated in the attached Table Nos. 1 to 3 of the List of Crimes from October 2, 2017.

2. Defendant B, who was a friendship, was aware of the fact that Defendant A, who was friendly, posted a false statement on the Internet “China” Roberkbook and received the sales proceeds from the victims. The Defendants conspired to receive the sales proceeds from the victims by posting a false statement on November 2017.

The Defendants, at around November 19, 2017, have access to the Internet “Seng-Seng-Seng-Seng-Seng-Seng-Seng-Seng-Seng-Seng-Seng-Seng (Seng-Seng-Seng)”.

Defendant B posted an advertisement to the effect that “Aphone 7 dud,” and that Defendant B sent the above “Aphone 7 dud,” on the part of sending KRW 330,00,00 to the victim N who reported and contacted this.

However, facts, the Defendants are true.

arrow