A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2015. 8. 9. 22:30경 창원시 성산구 C에 있는 창원중부경찰서 D파출소에서 그 전 E 등을 폭행한 혐의로 현행범인 체포된 사실에 화가 나 착용하고 있던 신발을 벗어 위 파출소 소속 경찰관인 F를 향해 던지고, 발로 위 F의 배 부위를 1회 걷어 찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest and investigation of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to a criminal report (for example, CD attachment);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution [Scope of Recommendation] In the case where the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor (a person subject to special mitigation] in the area of mitigation [a month or August] (a person subject to special mitigation] of the obstruction of execution of official duties, (b) the decision of sentence is contrary to the defendant's mistake, (c) the degree of obstruction of execution of official duties is not serious, (d) the defendant has no criminal records exceeding the same kind or fine, and (e) the punishment is determined as ordered in consideration of all the sentencing conditions such as the background of