The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, as stated in the facts in the judgment of the court below, did not want the victim D and the Buddhist male descendant as stated in the facts in the judgment of the court below, and merely caused the Defendant to commit the same act as stated in the facts in the judgment of the court below in order to receive a death from the male grandchild who saw the Defendant, and thus, even though there was no intention to interfere with business, the court below convicted the Defendant of the facts in the case, by

B. At the time of stopping the instant crime, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and was in a state of mental disorder or mental disability.

C. The sentence (one million won of fine) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined at the court below's erroneous determination of facts, in particular, the statement at the court of original instance D, and the police's statement of D, the defendant's statement of the victim's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son.

B. According to the records of mental and physical disorder, the Defendant is deemed to have committed the instant crime while drinking alcohol, but in light of the circumstances before and after the commission of the instant crime, the background leading up to the instant crime, and the Defendant’s behavior at the time, etc., it can be deemed that the Defendant had a lack or weak ability to discern things due to drinking at the time of stopping the instant crime.