logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.02.13 2013고정1803
사기등
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is a person who operates a child care center E in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City D.

Matters concerning financial accounts of child care centers shall be made on the integrated information system for infant care, and the payment of basic child care fees may be suspended when they violate the requirements for the payment of subsidies under the Infant Care Act. The State or local governments may order the establisher and operator of child care centers to return all or part of the subsidies already granted if he/she has received subsidies by fraud or other improper means. In the child care centers, in light of the legislative purpose of the Infant Care Act, which was enacted to protect the mental and physical health of infants and foster healthy members of society, the above accounting report shall be mandatory, have them be able to post supervision by keeping accounting books, etc., and order the return of the subsidies to ensure transparency in the application and the execution process of the subsidies under the Infant Care Act, and the basic child care fees shall be paid on the premise that the true accounting report and proper execution should be made.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received food materials from G, the main business operator of F, the head of the office, and received the food materials from H, who is a food materials supplier, and received the payment in two times, and received the payment in cash and received the payment in two times, and received the payment in cash, and received the payment in a false statement stating the amount in the false statement and received the payment in the false statement, and attempted to receive the subsidy by applying for the basic childcare fee by unlawful means, such as entering the amount in the false statement into the childcare integrated information system as if the amount in the false statement was an urgent emerculation executed actually.

Therefore, the Defendant received food materials from F on February 201.

arrow