Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On September 2, 2017, when the Defendant became aware of the fact that the Defendant lent money to the victim E (5.6 years and South) who was employed as a professor in the D University’s life sports and professor, the Defendant would be entitled to receive a return of the amount equivalent to KRW 5.6 million, such as the cost of Nopt North Korea demanded by the victim. The Defendant called the victim’s mobile phone number (F) and called the “to inform the school of the fact that he would not attend the school without giving money.”

9.7. 19:11 By phone to the victim, “I am the mind that the width sees the deceased;

Does it be the same as those in the school;

“I see the network in the school;

Along with the appearance of the school, it is necessary to keep the network one time in the school playground, and it seems that the inner body meets, and we have to pay money with the flag of the flag.

“,” and the same year

9. 11:08 by telephone to the victim on December 11, 198, “I am not to ring any person, but only two pages.”

“,” etc. refers to “ from September 2, 2017 to the same year.”

9. up to December 12, 5-6 currencyed several times.

As a result, the defendant reached repeatedly the sound that arouses anxiety for the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on telephone recording CDs;

1. Article 74 (1) 3 and Article 44 (1) 3 of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc., concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Detention in a workhouse (when a sentence of suspension of execution is invalidated or revoked, the amount of fine shall not be paid) under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) (one hundred thousand won per day) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., the circumstances and degree of the instant case, the Defendant’s mistake against the Defendant, and the first offender without any previous conviction, and the current age of 83 years that has no particular revenue and labor ability);