The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the penalty of the original judgment (4 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the judgment, the fact that the defendant made a confession of the crime while committing the crime, the fact that the degree of violence is relatively minor, the fact that there are no criminal records of the same kind is a favorable reason for sentencing. In order to establish the state's legal order and eradicate the light of public authority, the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties requires strict punishment, and the fact that the defendant committed the crime without being among the convicts is an unfavorable reason for sentencing

In full view of the above sentencing factors, considering the Defendant’s age, family relation, economic situation, background and motive leading to the crime, and all other matters regarding the sentencing specified in the records and arguments in this case, the judgment below’s punishment is deemed appropriate, and the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.