beta
Text
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
1. The court below which rejected the credibility of the above M's statement on the ground of the testimony of I and J without credibility despite the witness M consistently made a witness M in the summary of the grounds for appeal, and which acquitted him of the injury caused by violence among the facts charged of this case, has erred by misapprehending the facts which affected the conclusion of the judgment.
2. Determination
A. On May 2, 2012, the summary of the facts charged, around 20:50, the Defendant sought the Defendant again from the victim E, who found the Defendant at the H Sstuser in G, where he did drinking together with I and J, and led him out of Schlage, she met with his bomb, her bomb, the victim’s bomb, and her bomb with his her bomb, and her bom, and her bomb with the victim’s bomb, and the victim’s bomb with his bomb, and her bomb. The Defendant bomed the victim’s bomb with the victim’s bomb, who tried to bomd with the victim’s bomb from the side, and she was faced with the back part of the bomb.
As above, the Defendant abused the victim, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as an explosion under the external lebrosis, two ductal alleys, etc., where there is no head open room to treat the victim for about twenty (20) weeks.
B. The judgment of the court below is based on the evidence directly consistent with this part of the facts charged, but M has made a statement at the investigation agency and the court of the court below as evidence, i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged by the record, which are, the police, stated that the defendant was sealed by the victim's neck while the defendant was "hyd," but during the third trial, the defendant stated that "n't have memory as to the victim's neck," and that "I, the defendant, and the court of the court of the court below stated that the defendant was "hyd," and that the defendant was "hyd," and that "hyd, the nearest person was in the order of Ha, I, the defendant, and the court of the court at the time of the seventh trial, and that the victim was near the road."