1. The defendant,

A. The Suwon District Court shall assist the plaintiff A with respect to the real estate listed in the No. 1 annexed Table No. 1.

1. Basic facts

A. Farmland distribution, etc. for the instant military land 1) Each land listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each land of this case”) (hereinafter “each land of this case”), and “the land of this case” in accordance with the separate sheet in the separate sheet when referring to individual land.

) 30 thousand square meters of land located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Idong, Jdong, and Gyeonggi-si (hereinafter “instant military land”).

The first answer was made, but the registration of ownership transfer or the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of “state” in the name of “state” in 1941 through 1943, which was enforced by Japan during the Japanese occupation of the Japanese occupation. However, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of “state” as shown in the attached Table regarding each of the instant land. However, as for the instant land, most of the instant land, including each of the instant land, was actually used as a military land, and was cultivated by previous farmers instead of using as farmland.

Even after the sunset, farmers leased land previously cultivated by K, etc. and continuously occupied and cultivated it.

As to each land of this case, each person in the column for the possessor and cultivator of the attached Table leased and cultivated each land of this case from K, etc. after August 15, 1945.

3) On June 21, 1949, the Farmland Reform Act (amended by Act No. 4817 of Dec. 22, 1994; hereinafter “farmland Reform Act”).

The farmland distribution procedure was promulgated, and the person who received the farmland distribution from the defendant paid part of the repayment rice during the period from 1950 to 1952. However, since May 1953, the Ministry of National Defense asserted ownership on the ground that the price of the military land in this case was the state-owned land managed by the Army, and the defendant did not receive any more repayment rice. (B) The filing of a civil lawsuit by farmers and the filing of ownership transfer registration accordingly, 1), the land in this case Nos. 1, 5, 7, 8, 9 was the first, 5, 7, 8, and 8 of this case.