logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.01.29 2015나43911
구상금
Text

1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

1.The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in each entry or image of Gap evidence 1 to 6, by integrating the whole purport of the pleadings:

With respect to A vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the Plaintiff vehicle), the Defendant is an insurer who has concluded each comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to B vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the Defendant vehicle).

B. On October 19, 2014, at around 14:25, when the Plaintiff’s vehicle moved to the above three-lane intersection (hereinafter “instant intersection”) while driving along the two-lane road near the three-lane intersection in front of the Agricultural Cooperative Federation, Seocho-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “the instant road”) along the health and environment research institute as the one-lane of the two-lanes of the two-lanes, from the two-lanes, from the two-lane boundary of the road, the Plaintiff’s vehicle turned to the above three-lane intersection (hereinafter “the instant intersection”). On the other hand, the Plaintiff’s vehicle’s left from the exit of the maart located on the right side of the road and entered the one-lane of the instant road after the right side of the vehicle’s running direction, the accident of collision between the two-way direction

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”). C.

On November 24, 2014, the Plaintiff paid insurance proceeds of KRW 8,050,000 at the cost of repairing the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s instant accident occurred due to the unilateral negligence of the Defendant’s driver who entered the two-lanes of the instant road, leaving the two-lanes of the instant road in consideration of the flow of the vehicles driving along the instant road, despite the need to safely enter the two-lanes of the instant road. Therefore, the Plaintiff has the right to claim for the full amount of the insurance money paid by the Plaintiff to the Defendant, the insurer of the Defendant vehicle, and damages for delay.

B. The Defendant’s instant accident occurred in the course of entering the two-lanes of the instant road by moving the Defendant’s vehicle from the right edge to the right edge, and changing the lane into the one-lane, using the direction, etc. on the left edge.

arrow