The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (five million won penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment recognizes the defendant's own criminal act, there is no previous conviction exceeding the records of the same criminal act or fine, the fact that the actual benefit has not been gained is advantageous, but considering the risk of lending the access medium used essential for the criminal act of the criminal act of the criminal act of the criminal act of the criminal act of this case, there is a need for strict punishment when considering the risk of lending it. The defendant actually lent the access medium to the criminal act of the criminal act of the criminal act of the criminal act of the criminal act of the criminal act of the criminal act of the criminal act of the criminal act of the crime of the criminal act of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of this case, the damage was not significant, and the defendant's protective disposition of the juvenile and the suspension of indictment were taken several times until he becomes an adult, and other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, family relation, motive and method of the crime of this case and the circumstances after the crime of the crime, etc., the judgment below's punishment of the criminal act of the defendant cannot be justified.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.