logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.09.12 2016고단1493
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 00:30 on May 12, 2016, the Defendant driven a Bnew-style car with approximately 500 meters alcohol concentration at around 0.26% of alcohol level in the direction of an officetel in front of the new apartment building located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si to the front road of the 184-dong, Seo-gu, Dong-dong, Seodong-dong, the Defendant driven a B new-style car under the influence of alcohol leveling from around 500 meters to about 0.26% of alcohol level in blood.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death and Injury caused before the risk) is a person engaging in driving a motor vehicle B new model.

At the time of the day set forth in paragraph 1, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol as above, and proceeded three lanes in front of the 184-lane “Cloart” officetel located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-dong, in both sides of the three-lane 184, from the string of the current shooting distance to the string of the long distance.

At the time, the above road is night and the traffic of other vehicles was frequent, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to accurately operate steering gear, brakes, etc. and to safely drive the vehicle by checking well the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant’s negligence, while neglecting to drive normally due to the influence of alcohol as above, led to the Defendant’s failure to do so, and led to the Defendant’s failure to stop at the front of the Defendant’s driving direction, and the part behind the Category D bus, which was stopped at the front of the Defendant’s driving direction, was shocked into the front part of the new framework vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim E (V, 23 years old), who was on board the bus on the part of the above occupational negligence, such as salt, tensions, etc. of the climatic tensions requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment, the injury of the victim F (V, 23 years old), such as climatic salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim G (32 years old).

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's oral statement;

arrow