1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against Defendant C in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning for the judgment concerning this part of the basic facts is as follows, except for the part that contains partial modifications as follows, since the corresponding part of the “1. Basic Facts” among the judgment of the court of first instance (from 10 to 5 pages below the 3th judgment of the court of first instance) is the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (from 10 to 9 pages below the 5th judgment).

[Supplementary part] Under the third judgment of the court of first instance, 'The right to the leased object of this case is to be transferred to 150,000,000 won for the premium of this case', 'the right to the leased object of this case shall be transferred to 150,000 won for the premium of this case to 150,000 won for the premium of this case and all intangible property rights including the facilities and equipment of the child care center operated before Defendant B (hereinafter "child care center of this case").

On May 18, 2015, the first instance court's five pages 1, 2015, '5 May 27, 2015', '5 pages 4', and ' June 10, 2015' ' June 11, 2015.

2. The plaintiff's judgment on the plaintiff's main claim against defendant B

A. The reasons for the judgment of the court concerning this part of the claim for damages on the ground of the breach of duty of disclosure are as follows: (a) the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (b) six to six (6) 4; and (c) thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article

B. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The summary of the plaintiff's assertion 1) Defendant B, upon the execution of the instant improvement project through the terms of the instant special agreement, agreed to provide the plaintiff with an opportunity to recover the premium while continuing to operate a childcare center, but failed to comply with the agreement. Thus, the plaintiff is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages equivalent to KRW 150 million of the premium not recovered by the plaintiff. 2) The defendant B, while entering into the instant lease agreement, shall all the tangible and intangible property rights related to the instant childcare center that it operated.