1. It is confirmed that among the total 150,000 shares issued by C, 25,000 shares shares in Defendant B are the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. C Company was established on July 15, 200, and the shares issued by the said Company have been changed as follows:

AD E G FB

B. The Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to change the name of the above shares on the register of shareholders to the Plaintiff on December 17, 2007.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. If a person who held a trust under the name of a shareholder terminates the title trust agreement with the trustee, the shareholder’s right is returned to the title truster immediately (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 92Da16386, Oct. 27, 1992). Under the above agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the shareholder’s right to 25,00 shares in the name of the Defendant was returned to the Plaintiff; and as long as the Defendant requested a tax office’s confirmation that there was no disadvantage to himself/herself in tax, etc. and did not perform his/her duty under the above agreement, the Plaintiff is also entitled to seek

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.