The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On July 1, 2018, the Defendant driven a D Eccoo vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.120% at the 20cm section of the front road C, which is around 200cm in the Gu Government-si B. The Defendant driven a D Ecoo vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.40%.

2. Article 2 subparagraph 26 of the Road Traffic Act provides that the term "driving" means the use of a vehicle on the road in accordance with the original method of use. Since the concept of driving in this context includes the objective elements in light of the content of the provision, it is not the driving in a case where a motor vehicle is driven without the intention or involvement of a person in a motor vehicle.

Therefore, without any intention to allow any person to drive a motor vehicle, he/she walked the starting of the motor vehicle's engine for other purposes, and the motor vehicle is not operated in the case where he/she gets to drive a motor vehicle or gets to drive a motor vehicle due to the driving force of the motor, such as the defrising machine, etc., based on the driving force of the motor vehicle, or due to the unsound parking condition or road conditions.

(대법원 2004. 4. 23. 선고 2004도1109 판결 등 참조). 이 법원이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하면, 피고인은 당시 ‘C’ 식당에서 술을 마신 이후 이 사건 자동차의 운전석에 앉아 시동을 켠 사실, 주변에서 담배를 피우고 있던 사람이 피고인이 이 사건 자동차에 탑승한 이후 차량이 움직이는 것을 발견하고 112신고를 한 사실, 당시 신고자가 제출한 블랙박스 영상에는 이 사건 자동차가 잠깐 후진하다가 멈추는 장면이 녹화된 사실이 인정된다.

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the records of this case, there is no reasonable doubt that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone was an intentional driving under the Road Traffic Act.