logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.06.25 2014가단1163
공사대금등
Text

1. The Defendant: 5% per annum from October 22, 2014 to June 25, 2015 to the Plaintiffs and the following.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 12, 2009, the Defendant made a contract with Nonparty D on April 12, 2009 with the construction cost of KRW 301 through 304, and 306 (hereinafter “the instant construction project”) of KRW 301 through 304, and the construction cost of KRW 300 million as multi-family house (hereinafter “instant construction project”) and the construction cost of KRW 20 million from May 10, 2009 to July 15, 2009 (hereinafter “instant construction contract”). In the instant construction contract, part of the construction cost of KRW 200,000,000 among the construction cost of KRW 302,304, and KRW 301-68,000 among the instant building and KRW 300,000,000,000 and KRW 300,000,000 and KRW 30136,00,000.

C. The Plaintiff A, who was the Defendant’s mother, proposed the instant construction from Nonparty F to take charge of only the instant construction work, and introduced D to take charge of the entire construction work, and the instant construction contract was concluded. However, on July 8, 2009, the Plaintiffs succeeded to the instant construction work upon the waiver of the construction work.

After that, regarding No. 304, Non-Party G, which is an son designated by Plaintiff B on August 11, 2009, and Non-Party H and I designated by D on November 9, 2009 with respect to No. 306, and with respect to No. 302, each ownership transfer registration was completed in the G designated by Plaintiff A on November 13, 2009, and the plaintiffs completed all of the major parts of the work scheduled for construction as to No. 301 and 303, which are owned by the defendant around December 9, 2009.

E. However, this is the case.

arrow