Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 2017. 7. 28. 11:35 경부터 같은 날 11:50 경까지 천안시 동 남구 신부 7길 17 대 전지방 검찰청 천안 지청 민원실에서 “ 본인이 마누라를 팼는데 구속시켜 달라, 씨 발 놈들 아” 라며 민원업무를 담당하는 공무원인 B에게 욕설을 하고, 그곳에 있던 의자를 집어던지려 위협하고, 민원 데스크 위에 있던 안내 컴퓨터를 미는 등의 방법으로 직무를 집행하는 공무원인 B을 폭행하였다.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods at the time and time as described in the above 1. Paragraph 1., arrested a police officer dispatched at the place as a current criminal interfering with the performance of official duties, and left the above civil service center, and kidddd the utility of the entrance door of the city by walking the entrance door at one time at the seat of the entrance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. B written self-statements;

1. A criminal investigation report (damage to public goods);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of public duties and the selection of fines) concerning criminal facts, and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of damaging goods for public use and the selection of fines);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant, having reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, is found in the prosecutor's office.

In light of the object, method, etc. of the crime, it is not good to commit the crime.

However, the defendant acknowledges his mistake as an initial crime without criminal punishment.

No direct assault was committed against a public official.

It seems that the degree of damage to recommendations for public goods is not serious.

The defendant seems to be in a somewhat unstable mental state due to aftermath of explosion.

In addition, the defendant's age, sex, and behavior.