A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 19, 2018, at the D convenience store operated by the victim C in Busan Metropolitan City around 21:55 on June 19, 2018, the Defendant: (a) caused the death of the victim on the ground that the victim does not drink; (b)

Chewing, knife, knife and knife;

In addition, it interfered with the convenience store business of the victim by making it impossible for customers who have taken the place by avoiding the disturbance, such as taking a knife, taking the knife, driving the knife with the knife, etc., to enter the place.

2. On the same day, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at around 22:10 on the same day, was found to have been unable to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender of the crime of interference with his duties and to board the patrol vehicle by the light F of the situation belonging to the Gansan Police Station E District, the Gansan Police Station, who was dispatched to the scene after receiving a report from 112 that the person under the influence of alcohol in the above place was drunk, and, at around 2:10 on the same day, the Defendant was so doing.

Next, it is only a galle death, and Chewing gue. “F”, while taking a bath, she walked the back of the F, she walked once, she walked on three occasions, and she only died of her family in the course of moving to the E zone by getting on the patrol vehicle and moving to the E zone.

“The driver’s seat protection room was taken several times due to his/her head, and the police officer, from G office of the Gyeongsan Police Station G located in the Gyeongsan Police Station G located in 23:10 on the same day at around 23:10 on the same day, assaulted him/her, such as a police officer’s Hadle part of the E earth’s Hadle, one time to walk.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties on the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and H:

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of each investigation report (afix, such as a copy of work log), and (Attachment of CCTV photographs, etc. for committing a crime);

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of interference with business) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties);

1. Commercial concurrence;