logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2015.04.28 2015고단44
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 21:40 on December 14, 2014, the Defendant: (a) driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol of at least 0.166% of blood alcohol concentration at the section of about 46 km from the front of the Jin apartment parking lot located in Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-do, Hongcheon-ro, to the front road of the 116 U.S. Min apartment parking lot located in the original week name, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol of at least 0.166%.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle with a hived motor vehicle in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Road Traffic Act (unsatised after an accident).

On December 14, 2014, at around 21:40, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol with 0.166% of alcohol concentration 0.16%, and led to the driving of the said car in front of the green ginseng street in the name of the original city, the name of the original city, and the front of the apartment ginseng street in front of the original city.

The location is an intersection where traffic is controlled by signal apparatus, and there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving the victim D(the age of 44) E-learning car in front of the direction of the operation of the said car, and the Glance car in the victim F(the age of 53) Glance car in the victim F(the age of 53) is stopping for each signal signal. In such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately operating the steering e-mail and operating the steering wheel and brake system in a safe manner after the said car.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and found that the above flured passenger vehicle stopped for the signal waiting at a late time while driving the above flured passenger vehicle, and operated it to avoid this, but did not avoid it, and received the back part of the fluring passenger vehicle as the front part of the fluring passenger vehicle, and received the back part of the fluring passenger vehicle as the front part of the fluring passenger vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, provides approximately three weeks of medical treatment to victims D.

arrow