All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. We examine each of the above arguments by the Defendant and the prosecutor together with each of the above arguments, and each of the frauds committed repeatedly by taking advantage of the trust relationship with the victims, such as by deceiving money by the Defendant from the perpetrator under the pretext of borrowing money, making it stuffed in gambling. Each of the larcenys commits a theft of property by damaging another person's dwelling or a structure at night, and the nature of the crime and the degree of damage are not easy in light of the law of the crime and the degree of damage, etc., and the fact that the damage is insufficient to recover and that the victim did not receive a letter from the victims is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

On the other hand, in full view of all the sentencing conditions stated in the arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, change of circumstances after the sentence of the lower judgment, etc., the sentence of the lower court seems to be within a reasonable and appropriate scope, and it cannot be deemed unfair or unreasonable, because it seems that the sentence of the lower court is within a reasonable and appropriate scope.

Therefore, the defendant and the prosecutor's argument are without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.