A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:40 on January 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed a assault with other customers, such as D, at singing toilets B 4 of the former B, and sent to the site after being reported 112; and (b) obstructed police officers’ legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of reports and the maintenance of order by assaulting the Defendant, who was under the influence of alcohol on the back of the 112 patrol patrol unit, separate from other people, to ascertain the circumstances of the case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The defendant asserts that he was in a state of mental or physical loss or mental weakness by stating that he had no memory at the time of committing the instant crime under the influence of alcohol at the time of the instant crime. As such, according to the records, the defendant was found to have drinking alcohol at the time of committing the instant crime, but in light of the details of the instant crime and the defendant's behavior before and after the instant crime, etc. acknowledged by the aforementioned evidence, it cannot be deemed that the defendant had no or weak ability to discern things at the time of committing the crime, and thus, the above assertion by the defendant cannot be accepted.

The reason for sentencing [the scope of recommendation] The reason for sentencing is that there is no person in charge of the basic area (six months to one year and four months) (the decision of sentencing) [the decision of sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] the defendant is a fighting with another person under the influence of alcohol, and the police officer who said the decision of sentencing is legitimate execution of official duties by exercising violence.